Tomorrow’s World
by Herr NeilTelevised cricket received a shot in the arm when Channel 4 won the rights to show England’s home test matches and select one-day internationals. Adding to existing technologies (such as stump-cam and stump-mic) snickometer, hawk-eye and super-slow-mo action replays, have all helped to increase fans’ enjoyment of the sport. In addition, these developments have made cricket more appealing to many who were previously indifferent to its quirky charms. New technological features have helped pundits and analysts to explain the nuances and subtleties of what can, from the outset, be a baffling game.
So where does football come into this? If we believe what Sky Sports tells us, there is no more exciting spectacle than Portsmouth v Aston Villa on a wet Monday evening! But in reality it is a rare match that doesn’t have lulls, drab spells and limitless sequences of unadventurous square-balls. It is surely in broadcasters’ interests to brighten up these snoozefests. More exciting means more viewers, which means more advertising revenue. Viewers aren’t going to stay tuned just because they can now see a player’s fizzog in glorious High Definition detail. With red buttons, hundreds of channels and squillions of pounds being spent on rights to show matches, surely we’re due some sort of advance in technological wizardry to liven up football.
Super slow-mo replays of grimacing defenders mid-header; tackle snickometers revealing just how bad that last challenge was - even a clichéd Matrix-style multiple camera effect would do! Cameras in goalposts like stump-cam, or wireless cameras attached to assistant referees to give us an official’s eye view. How about some stats telling us how fast Aaron Lennon just sprinted down the flank, or what speed Peter Crouch’s shot was travelling when it burst through the back of the net?!
All viable, all possible, and none of them would interfere with the ’spirit of the game’ that the suits at Soho Square are so keen to protect. Where has four decades of televised football got us? The same replay from four different angles and a flag that pops up on the screen when someone is offside!
Do you agree that football coverage would benefit from a broader range of technological features? Can any WCH readers suggest some ideas that broadcasters could employ to enhance our viewing experience of future World Cups?





July 6th, 2006 at 8:38 am
Why not go the whole hog and introduce 1/4 time breaks, time outs power play sessions? I see a vision of the future of footy being very similar to the Bud adverts for the premiership last season.
July 6th, 2006 at 10:28 am
Why not put the camera *inside the ball* - would fit the Lost/24 non-stop utterly-baffling action ethos? Only risk is unexpected sudden extreme close-up of Lee Bowyer - yeah actually that’s too high a price.
July 6th, 2006 at 11:02 am
Make the players play in flippers and wear blindfolds, replace the ball with a cannon, put managers’ technical areas inside the centre circle and extend the match to 46 minutes per half.
July 6th, 2006 at 2:54 pm
How about a big boxing glove that swings down from the roof of the stand and punches a corner taker in the face if he fails to beat the first defender? It would certainly make players think.
July 6th, 2006 at 9:55 pm
I’d like to see a micro camera on a radio controlled plane or helicopter, flying around the ground. It could give on pitch interviews with players whenever there’s a stoppage for injury.
July 7th, 2006 at 4:54 pm
Or maybe mic up the ref and his team of officials so we can hear why decisions are given. And the players too, so we can hear their meagre excuses.
July 9th, 2006 at 1:57 pm
How about using jumpers for goalposts?
July 10th, 2006 at 7:24 am
I think they should use goalposts for jumpers.
July 11th, 2006 at 9:46 am
I think one player on each team should be allowed to use a wheelbarrow.